Skip to main content

Why I teach judo throws in jiujitsu class

I got a question the other day from one of the Academy's white belt students. He said that it seems like I am the only instructor that teaches throws and asked why I taught throws.  There are a lot of ways that I could answer the question, but the sake of time I just said that I teach the Academy curriculum first and that I also teach related judo throws from which the curriculum originated.  I went on to say that if they watched videos of Master Helio Gracie from several decades ago he is doing throws.  Judo throws.  He was listed at a 7th dan with the Kodokan and was even asked to teach there. 

I have seen video of Royce Gracie competing in judo tournaments.  I have seen jiujitsu competitions with Royler Gracie doing judo takedowns.  So many people either don't know or refuse to admit that the Gracie style of jiujitsu has its origins in old school judo, which itself is a style or offshoot of Japanese jujitsu.  Japanese jujitsu didn't skip judo and suddenly become Gracie jiujitsu.  In the evolution of competition jiujitsu, however, lots of the judo has been lost and/or discarded for a preference to either just sit on ones butt, jump to guard, or to do a few simple wrestling style takedowns that don't rely on the gi. 

So, I am teaching judo-style throws because it is jiujitsu.  They are not different arts, just different aspects of the same art, to me.  Sport jiujitsu and sport judo have cause a rift and divergence from one another that is becoming all too defined.  The techniques were not meant to be two different arts altogether, just different aspects of the same complete art.  Throws were good enough for Master Helio, it was good enough for the few black belts he awarded, so it is good enough for me.

The next reason is that the stand-up game is more practical for actual self-defense, which I thought was the primary purpose of jiujitsu.  Very rarely do actual physical confrontations begin from the ground.  So I teach how to get someone effectively from the standing to the ground phase of a fight.  If you can effectively throw someone, that alone can finish a fight, or efficiently set you up for a relatively easy follow-on submission.  Not only that but teaching the throws also teaches you how to defend yourself from throws, and how to fall properly to avoid getting hurt if and when you are taken down.  Master Rickson Gracie is known to discuss what he calls "invisible jiujitsu."  After having attended two classes where he discussed that and demonstrated techniques of this invisible jiujitsu, I didn't see what the big deal was.  I had seen it before quite a bit...in judo.  The use of the hip to check a throw or shifting weight to block other throws is not mysterious to the judo player.

Finally, at least for this post, two of the top brown belts in our Academy also are brown belts in judo.  One of our purple belt instructors holds a brown belt in judo.  I have heard that The Professor has a black belt specifically in judo aside form his jiujitsu credentials and also competed in judo.  I personally have been a blue belt in judo for many years but I neither compete nor will I take an exam for brown belt due to my own reasons unrelated to skill and knowledge of judo. With that said, when some of the top students in the club are advanced judo players it is hard to not believe that one skill set compliments the other.  They are not unrelated arts.  They are more like two sides to the same coin. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Judo vs. Jiujitsu

Since the very inception of judo it has had to defend itself from the skeptics of whether or not it could hold its own against jujitsu. Judo, created by Dr. Jigoro Kano in 1882, was conceived from jujitsu originally, but with many of the more dangerous techniques removed and with an emphasis on sportsmanship and personal development rather than purely a combative art. Among judo's first tests again jujitsu was with the Tokyo Police in 1886. The police department was searching for a fighting method for its officers. 15 judo players versus 15 jujitsu players from a rival school. Judo won 13 of the 15 matches. The rivalry moved forward when years later in 1951 Brazilian jiujitsu (note spelling), founded by the Gracie family of Brazil, took on Japans judo masters in competition. Brazilian jiujitsu ( BJJ ), however, is not the jujitsu of old from Japan. BJJ is a derivative of the original form of judo brought to Brazil by a judo master. At that time judo was often calle...

The Best Techniques

"All models are wrong; some models are useful"--George Edward Pelham Box Just like all pizza is not good pizza, the same holds true as jiujitsu: Not all jiujitsu is good jiujitsu. Even with the jiujitsu of the Gracie's, not all Gracie JiuJitsu is the same jiujitsu either. One Professor’s jiujitsu is not the same as another Professor's jiujitsu. One Professor may be a small man and emphasize technique and timing over power more than a Professor that developed as a very athletic, large player who may emphasize technique and timing less.  So having a black belt from one is not the same as having a black belt from another. I'm not saying that one is better than the other I am just saying that one style does not equate to the other. There’s no such thing as “the best” martial art.  Martial arts are the best for what they were developed for.  The martial arts of my Bushido are taekwondo (TKD), MCMAP (and subsequently (LINE), and judo/jiujitsu.  TKD known for its ki...

Gracie University: Learning jiujitsu online?!

There's been lots of controversy in the Brazilian jiujitsu community over Rorion Gracie and his sons' Gracie University, which enables people to learn and earn rank, primarily online. Many of the purest out there are outraged because of the far harder road they've had to take to get a belt. Here are some opinions of my own in posts to online communities about it: It's both and a great business strategy. But here's my thing: I practice both judo and GJJ.....which in my opinion is a subset of judo. Judo kata or GU simulated combat: What's the difference? I think there are many issues at play here, two of which are knowing the techniques for promotion and two, being able to apply them to an unwilling person. Up to blue belt I can understand just knowing the techniques, but beyond that in my opinion the point is to be able to apply them to an unwilling opponent. Another thing is that I don't get the 600 techniques that the Gracie Academy is talking about. I m...