Skip to main content

Judo vs. Jiujitsu

Since the very inception of judo it has had to defend itself from the skeptics of whether or not it could hold its own against jujitsu. Judo, created by Dr. Jigoro Kano in 1882, was conceived from jujitsu originally, but with many of the more dangerous techniques removed and with an emphasis on sportsmanship and personal development rather than purely a combative art. Among judo's first tests again jujitsu was with the Tokyo Police in 1886. The police department was searching for a fighting method for its officers. 15 judo players versus 15 jujitsu players from a rival school. Judo won 13 of the 15 matches.

The rivalry moved forward when years later in 1951 Brazilian jiujitsu (note spelling), founded by the Gracie family of Brazil, took on Japans judo masters in competition. Brazilian jiujitsu (BJJ), however, is not the jujitsu of old from Japan. BJJ is a derivative of the original form of judo brought to Brazil by a judo master. At that time judo was often called jujitsu or jiujitsu popularly, but was a separate distinct style of its own. What separated BJJ from judo was that BJJ had an emphasis on ground techniques and testing on street combat, whereas judo the emphasis was on throwing techniques and sport competition. The tenancy is that judoka control the standing game, but once the fight goes to the ground the BJJ player tends to control the fight. Fights typically ended in draws, with one major win to BJJ and another to judo.

The rivalry continued into the 1990's with the Gracie's and others taking on judoka from Japan and other countries. Judoka enter BJJ competitions and win, and BJJ players enter judo competitions and win.

The question always lingers, "Which style is better?" More and more the schools seem to be merging as more athletes and recreational players supplement their training with the other. Rhadi Ferguson, 2004 Judo Olympian, has black belts in both styles, for example. So do Dave and Dan Camarillo, who were originally judo players. The two styles complement one another, and I'd argue, are two side of the same coin. BJJ originated from judo and possesses some of the philosophy and technique that was lost to the competition rules of judo. The Gracie's took that philosophy and technique and expounded upon it with their own training philosophy of realistic fighting and training and developed their own style of "judo" from it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gracie Combatives: Jiujitsu Evolved...for Beginners

The Gracie Academy has been able to reach out and gain influence in the jiujitsu community effectively acquiring schools through a de-facto affiliation.  The attraction has been through marketing their teaching methods via Gracie University, using that as a tool to gain and retain students and to grow your school and profits.  The gateway is Gracie Combatives (GC).  I recently completely and passed the GC online test, scoring high enough to qualify to attend the instructor certification course held at the Gracie Academy in Torrance, CA.  Currently a brown belt with over ten years jiujitsu experience I found the program surprisingly challenging and effective as a tool for teaching good self-defense techniques and providing an organized baseline by which to engage and measure my progress.  The good, the bad and the..the "it's up to you": The Good: There is an organized curriculum with highly detailed instruction on the philosophy of the training et...

The Path to the Black Belt

The Path to the Black Belt I came into jiujitsu with the purpose of 1) learning self-defense and 2) getting a black belt to affirm my proficiency and so that I can certify my children's technique and award them with belts as they earn them.  The path isn't as simple as I thought it would be.  I thought I would have to learn techniques and at some point have to demonstrate those techniques to be awarded a belt.  When I first started I found out that time limits and promotions were subjective and completely up to your coach/instructor.  I didn't care for this approach.  There was no set curriculum or time limits.  It was very general.  Basically one should be submitting 90% of people at their current belt level before being considered for promotion.  That was about it.  If you "looked" like you were ready for a stripe, you got a stripe.  4 stripes and then when you "looked like" you were ready for the next belt it was handed to yo...

Leg Attacks

I'll say this up front: I am not a competitor. I practice jiujitsu for self-defense and for personal development. Leg attacks are not a big deal for me mainly because I don't compete. I rarely do them but I am as a brown belt in jiujitsu, only a one or two stripe white belt, so to speak, with leg attacks. I’ve started using straight ankle locks here and there, but I don’t dare to get into the game of knees just yet until I have learned to properly protect myself and protect my training partners. Dave has a very evolved leg methodology that I have to get some more perspective on, probably in private lessons. Inside, outside, high, and low. I’ll put some more notes to this, but it’s a hierarchy of what leg attacks have advantage of the other. Basically if the opponents spine is the center line, where your legs should be to protect yourself while attacking their legs, and what leg locks have tactical advantages over a potential counter leg attack...in other words ...